Philosophy in Crisis

Philosophy in Crisis

Share this post

Philosophy in Crisis
Philosophy in Crisis
The Paradox of Sincerity: Unity of Right and Wrong in Sincere Role Enactment

The Paradox of Sincerity: Unity of Right and Wrong in Sincere Role Enactment

Agamemnon cannot be blamed for a choice he was bound to be both right and wrong in taking. This is the basic contradiction of the Sincerity mode of identity technology. Let's explore it!

Carlos L.'s avatar
Carlos L.
Jan 04, 2024
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

Philosophy in Crisis
Philosophy in Crisis
The Paradox of Sincerity: Unity of Right and Wrong in Sincere Role Enactment
4
2
Share

Aeschylus’s Orestia depicts, like other great Greek tragedies, the paradoxes at play in the sincerity mode of identity technology. In the pre-modern world, who we were was tied to the roles we occupied. Identity was not yet, as we get with the Age of Enlightenment, a question of finding your authentic self. The idea of ‘finding your true self’ would not have made much sense in the pre-modern world. The notion of identity being a process of profile curation, as we see in our age of profilicity, would have, of course, made even less sense.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Philosophy in Crisis to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carlos L.
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share